It's pretty striking how many commentators are noting this trend... and also how determined legacy media and mainstream cultural producers are to pretend that it doesn't exist.
It's not a matter of one side making claims and others refuting them. The new right is screaming about feminization and suicidal empathy... and the gatekeepers are absolutely silently. SUSPICIOUSLY silent, I would say.
Thanks for this, as awful as it is to realise. The invasion of Europe is now a reality. The cover up for the origin of the criminals is both denial and death wish. It means the importation of such populations will continue. As if demographic depopulation wasn't enough. What a horrible country, Spain. There was always a darkness to it, probably stemming from both its fanatic Catholic heritage and long Moorish past. Spain was always the backwater of Europe. Perhaps that is an additional reason for the crisis.
I’m glad you didn’t pull any punches and used the word execute. The state failed her and really washed its hands of her in the darkest way. I want to support very limited euthanasia painful terminal illness but I can’t bc the guardians of sanity and morality are mad. The slippery slope is vertical at this point. I think a sign of the sick place the west is in is that I see posts on twitter and substack such as this case and I say that can’t possibly be true there’s something more to it so I do research and more and more it’s real.
“A nation can survive its fools but it cannot survive treason from within”
An inversion of morality in what has become known as suicidal empathy has led to a perversion of the very concept of justice. Whether it is treating criminals as victims themselves, or creating a multitiered system of injustice where the accused are treated differently based on their ethnicity / religion / legal status / social status, or protecting some by violating the rights of others - we are losing key values: equal protection under the law, justice that is applied equally and is blind to a person's personal attributes, and the right to speak out against systemic injustice or immoral policies of governments (which exist to protect and serve their citizens). Respect for the law is undermined when laws are applied unequally, punishment is not swift and certain, and those criticizing criminals are punished more harshly than the criminals themselves.
Most of us who have lived and worked in other countries were aware that we were guests, and as such were subject to the laws of our host countries. While we may not have adopted the culture and values of our host countries entirely, at the same time we did not treat their laws with contempt, or disregard their moral restraints. It is not unreasonable to expect those who migrate to Western countries to follow the laws of their host countries and to forego any parts of their own culture that violate the strong moral prohibitions of the host culture.
While I am very sympathetic toward those who would prefer to end their own lives due to unrelenting, horribly debilitating pain, or a diagnosis of a painful or wasting terminal illness, we see from Spain, Belgium , Netherlands, and Canada that these measures are not containable. The door of euthanasia, once opened for the terminally ill suffering from intractable pain, will eventually be opened to other groups, until eventually it is justified as any victim's right and a money saving process for the state universal healthcare system. It is an easy jump to execute the chronically depressed or even the desperately unhappy.
Is there any truth to the report I saw that Noelia’s organs were donated? Furthermore, that her euthanasia/execution was hastened because of patients needing specific organs? I read something about that but I can’t trust the report.
But apparently, this idea originally comes from statements by Polonia Castellanos, president of Abogados Cristianos (Christian Lawyers), which represented the father and opposed the death on religious grounds. So, not that reliable.
Wikipedia: “Her father's lawyers also said that her euthanasia could not be suspended as her organs were already committed to donation, and that doctors had financial interests in the donation of her organs, both of which are legally false.”
Onda Cero radio: “A person who wants to receive euthanasia and donate the organs can only decide once he has completed the entire legal euthanasia application process. Additionally, the willingness to donate can be revoked at any time.”
I'll take the word of her father who was no doubt familiar with the case, over the opinion of some Wikipedia editor who wasn't there and doesn't want it to be true because it makes euthanasia look bad.
The oppressed cannot be guilty of anything when acting against the oppressor. This is the central concept of progressive culture today, purposeful for choas and erosion of social order.
Censoring the offenders' origin and religion is unjustifiable. I think the more intelligent version of the feminist argument against focusing on crimes by foreigners is that these claim gain valence from bigotry, while the bigger danger to women is still from inside the house, so to speak, and is ignored.
But this does not justify straining the very systems meant to protect the women and girls from abusive family members and acquaintances with imported foreigners.
The otherwise generally awesome tv show Rake had a plot line centered around this sort of outrage, and they resolved it by revealing that akshually the victim in question was abused at home and not by foreigners. I thought it was very cowardly and artless.
Is it possible to maintain that the greater danger to women is from inside the home if the cases are not being reported accurately? This has long been the rhetoric against patriarchy, but is it still the case since open borders policy has been implemented in certain Western countries?
It’s not suicidal empathy. It’s international socialism.
It's pretty striking how many commentators are noting this trend... and also how determined legacy media and mainstream cultural producers are to pretend that it doesn't exist.
It's not a matter of one side making claims and others refuting them. The new right is screaming about feminization and suicidal empathy... and the gatekeepers are absolutely silently. SUSPICIOUSLY silent, I would say.
https://jmpolemic.substack.com/p/performative-compassion-and-suicidal
Thanks for this, as awful as it is to realise. The invasion of Europe is now a reality. The cover up for the origin of the criminals is both denial and death wish. It means the importation of such populations will continue. As if demographic depopulation wasn't enough. What a horrible country, Spain. There was always a darkness to it, probably stemming from both its fanatic Catholic heritage and long Moorish past. Spain was always the backwater of Europe. Perhaps that is an additional reason for the crisis.
This is infuriating. The malady not unique to Spain -- this suicidal empathy is devouring the entire Europe.
I’m glad you didn’t pull any punches and used the word execute. The state failed her and really washed its hands of her in the darkest way. I want to support very limited euthanasia painful terminal illness but I can’t bc the guardians of sanity and morality are mad. The slippery slope is vertical at this point. I think a sign of the sick place the west is in is that I see posts on twitter and substack such as this case and I say that can’t possibly be true there’s something more to it so I do research and more and more it’s real.
“A nation can survive its fools but it cannot survive treason from within”
Pray tell what did he blatantly lie about?
You're glad he blatantly lied?
An inversion of morality in what has become known as suicidal empathy has led to a perversion of the very concept of justice. Whether it is treating criminals as victims themselves, or creating a multitiered system of injustice where the accused are treated differently based on their ethnicity / religion / legal status / social status, or protecting some by violating the rights of others - we are losing key values: equal protection under the law, justice that is applied equally and is blind to a person's personal attributes, and the right to speak out against systemic injustice or immoral policies of governments (which exist to protect and serve their citizens). Respect for the law is undermined when laws are applied unequally, punishment is not swift and certain, and those criticizing criminals are punished more harshly than the criminals themselves.
Most of us who have lived and worked in other countries were aware that we were guests, and as such were subject to the laws of our host countries. While we may not have adopted the culture and values of our host countries entirely, at the same time we did not treat their laws with contempt, or disregard their moral restraints. It is not unreasonable to expect those who migrate to Western countries to follow the laws of their host countries and to forego any parts of their own culture that violate the strong moral prohibitions of the host culture.
While I am very sympathetic toward those who would prefer to end their own lives due to unrelenting, horribly debilitating pain, or a diagnosis of a painful or wasting terminal illness, we see from Spain, Belgium , Netherlands, and Canada that these measures are not containable. The door of euthanasia, once opened for the terminally ill suffering from intractable pain, will eventually be opened to other groups, until eventually it is justified as any victim's right and a money saving process for the state universal healthcare system. It is an easy jump to execute the chronically depressed or even the desperately unhappy.
Is there any truth to the report I saw that Noelia’s organs were donated? Furthermore, that her euthanasia/execution was hastened because of patients needing specific organs? I read something about that but I can’t trust the report.
Unfortunately, I don’t have a clean answer for you, but I can share what I do have.
I have seen Heidi Klessing say the same thing, and as far as I know, she’s a reputable source:
https://x.com/heidiklessigmd/status/2037223383146869170?s=20
But apparently, this idea originally comes from statements by Polonia Castellanos, president of Abogados Cristianos (Christian Lawyers), which represented the father and opposed the death on religious grounds. So, not that reliable.
Wikipedia: “Her father's lawyers also said that her euthanasia could not be suspended as her organs were already committed to donation, and that doctors had financial interests in the donation of her organs, both of which are legally false.”
Onda Cero radio: “A person who wants to receive euthanasia and donate the organs can only decide once he has completed the entire legal euthanasia application process. Additionally, the willingness to donate can be revoked at any time.”
https://www.ondacero.es/noticias/sociedad/bulos-eutanasia-noelia-castillo-que-fue-violada-menas-que-sus-organos-estaban-comprometidos_2026032869c7920abfc2456bae16da4c.html
20 minutos: (same as Onda Cero)
https://www.20minutos.es/nacional/los-bulos-sobre-eutanasia-noelia-castillo-agresiones-sexuales-menas-donacion-organos-muerte-por-depresion_6951831_0.html
A perfect vignette of our times.
I'll take the word of her father who was no doubt familiar with the case, over the opinion of some Wikipedia editor who wasn't there and doesn't want it to be true because it makes euthanasia look bad.
The oppressed cannot be guilty of anything when acting against the oppressor. This is the central concept of progressive culture today, purposeful for choas and erosion of social order.
Horrific case.
Censoring the offenders' origin and religion is unjustifiable. I think the more intelligent version of the feminist argument against focusing on crimes by foreigners is that these claim gain valence from bigotry, while the bigger danger to women is still from inside the house, so to speak, and is ignored.
But this does not justify straining the very systems meant to protect the women and girls from abusive family members and acquaintances with imported foreigners.
The otherwise generally awesome tv show Rake had a plot line centered around this sort of outrage, and they resolved it by revealing that akshually the victim in question was abused at home and not by foreigners. I thought it was very cowardly and artless.
Is it possible to maintain that the greater danger to women is from inside the home if the cases are not being reported accurately? This has long been the rhetoric against patriarchy, but is it still the case since open borders policy has been implemented in certain Western countries?